Let’s talk about something that’s been bothering me—and probably you too, if you’ve spent any time in the relationship advice corner of the internet.
Everywhere you look, someone’s talking about attachment styles. “I’m anxiously attached, that’s why I’m clingy.” “He’s avoidant, that’s why he won’t commit.” “We’re incompatible because of our attachment types.” It’s become the astrology of pop psychology—a neat little box to explain away every relationship problem you’ve ever had.
But here’s the uncomfortable truth: using attachment theory as an excuse is keeping you stuck.
The Problem with Pop Psychology Labels
Don’t get me wrong—attachment theory isn’t complete nonsense. The original research has value. But what’s happened on social media and in self-help books? That’s a different story. We’ve taken nuanced psychological concepts and turned them into personality horoscopes that let us avoid the real work.
When you label yourself as “anxiously attached,” it’s easy to say, “Well, of course I texted him fifteen times—that’s just how I am.” When he’s “avoidant,” you can excuse his emotional unavailability as something wired into him, not a choice he’s making (or that you’re choosing to tolerate).
This is where it all goes wrong. These labels become shields. They protect you from looking at the harder question: Why am I accepting this? Why am I choosing this pattern again?
The Real Issue: You Don’t Love Yourself Enough
I know this sounds harsh. But stay with me.
Everything—and I mean *everything*—in your romantic life stems from how you see yourself. Your self-esteem. Your self-respect. Your sense of self-worth.
If you don’t love yourself, if you don’t respect yourself, no man ever will. That’s not pessimism—that’s reality. Because when you don’t value yourself, you teach others how little you’re worth. You tolerate disrespect. You accept breadcrumbs. You twist yourself into knots trying to earn love that should be freely given.
And then? You end up like Carrie Bradshaw—chasing emotionally unavailable men for six seasons while calling it “complicated” instead of calling it what it is: self-abandonment.
What You’re Really Avoiding
Here’s what happens when you hide behind attachment theory or any other pop psychology framework:
You avoid responsibility. It’s easier to blame his attachment style than to ask yourself why you stayed after the third time he disappeared. It’s easier to say “I’m just anxious” than to examine why you need constant validation from someone who barely gives you attention.
You avoid the truth. Not righteousness—*truth*. There’s a difference. Righteousness is “He’s wrong and I’m right.” Truth is “This situation isn’t working, and I’m choosing to stay in it. Why?”
You avoid your shadow. The parts of you that are wounded. The trauma you haven’t processed. The patterns you learned in childhood that you’re now repeating with romantic partners. This is the real work—the shadow work—and it’s uncomfortable. It’s so much easier to take a quiz that tells you you’re “fearful-avoidant” and call it self-awareness.
What Actually Matters: Your Sense of Self
The foundation of healthy relationships isn’t compatibility tests or attachment style matching. It’s you knowing who you are. What you value. What you stand for. What your values—your deeper meanings, your “why”—actually are.
When you don’t have a strong sense of self, you become a chameleon. You mold yourself to fit whoever you’re dating. You lose your boundaries. You forget what you wanted in the first place because you’re so focused on being wanted.
This is why self-love isn’t some Instagram caption—it’s the actual work. It means:
– Knowing your values and not compromising them for anyone
– Setting boundaries and walking away when they’re violated
– Choosing yourself even when it’s lonely, even when you’re scared
– Being honest about what’s really happening, not what you wish was happening
– Doing your shadow work—facing your wounds, your patterns, your fears
The Truth vs. Righteousness
Let me explain this one more carefully because it’s crucial.
Righteousness is when you make yourself the victim and the other person the villain. It’s a defense mechanism. It lets you feel superior while avoiding your part in the dynamic. “He’s toxic.” “He’s a narcissist.” “His attachment style is the problem.”
Truth is different. Truth is harder. Truth is looking at the situation clearly and asking: “What role did I play here? Why did I accept this treatment? What in me needs to change so I don’t repeat this pattern?”
Truth doesn’t mean blaming yourself for someone else’s bad behaviour. But it does mean taking radical responsibility for your choices—including the choice to stay, to hope, to make excuses, to ignore red flags.
So What Now?
If you’ve been using attachment theory (or any other framework) as a crutch, it’s time to put it down. Not because understanding patterns is useless—but because understanding without action is just intellectualised avoidance.
The real questions are:
– Do you love yourself enough to walk away from someone who doesn’t meet you halfway?
– Do you respect yourself enough to stop making excuses for poor treatment?
– Are you willing to sit with your discomfort and do the shadow work instead of jumping into the next relationship hoping it’ll be different?
– Can you choose yourself—your peace, your boundaries, your truth—even when it’s hard?
Because here’s the thing: you can read every article about attachment styles, listen to every podcast about relationship psychology, and still end up in the same painful patterns.
Why? Because you haven’t done the foundational work. You haven’t built the self-love and self-respect that make healthy relationships possible.
The Bottom Line
Stop hiding behind labels. Stop blaming attachment styles. Stop waiting for the right person to fix what’s broken inside you.
The work is you. The answer is you. The foundation is self-love, self-respect, and a solid sense of who you are and what you stand for.
Do that work first. The rest will follow.
Leave a Reply